Systems and Methods for Harvesting and Implanting Hair Using Image-Generated Topological Skin Models

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are provided for determining the need to change and/or changing orientation of a tool relative to an object on a body in at least partially automated procedure. Also, systems and methods are provided for orienting a hair harvesting tool relative to a follicular unit to be harvested. Further, systems and methods of implanting follicular units are provided, which are based on the orientation of the existing follicular units or based on pre-determined insertion angle. The provided systems and methods use image processing and image-generated topological skin models. In some embodiments surface fit is performed using, for example, a planar fit, quadric fit, cubic fit, mesh fit and parametric fit.

RELATED APPLICATION DATA

The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/242,511 filed Sep. 23, 2011 and entitled “System and Method for Harvesting and Implanting Hair using Image-Generated Topological Skin Models”, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/402,355, filed Mar. 11, 2009 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,048,090.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to systems and methods for hair harvesting, implantation and transplantation and, in particular, to devices and techniques that allow reducing potential damage to and maintaining the integrity of the harvested hair follicles.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Hair transplantation procedures are well-known, and typically involve harvesting donor hair grafts from the “donor areas,” for example, side and back fringe areas of the patient's scalp, or other body surfaces, and implanting them in a bald area (“recipient area”). Various techniques were developed over the years for harvesting donor hair grafts. One such technique involves excising a strip of skin from the back area of the scalp and then dissecting the strip under a microscope to isolate individual hair follicular units for later implantation into the recipient area. This technique suffers numerous disadvantages, including being very time consuming, tedious, expensive, and requiring suturing and resulting scarring. Recently some physicians employ a technique called Follicular Unit Extraction (“FUE”) that allows harvest of individual follicular units without a need to cut a strip of tissue from the patient's scalp.

An FUE method for harvesting follicular units allows for individual follicular units to be harvested directly from the donor area by utilizing a hollow punch having a cutting edge and an interior lumen with a diameter of, for example, 1 mm. The punch is used to make a small circular incision in the skin around the follicular unit. Thereafter, the follicular unit is removed, e.g., using forceps, for subsequent implantation into a recipient site with a specially devised insertion needle. FUE procedure avoids scarring associated with cutting a strip of scalp, reduces patient's discomfort, and reduces recovery time, however, it is a laborious procedure, take a long time to perform and it requires a high degree of technical skill.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,572,625 (the “Rassman patent”) describes a particular mechanism for an alignment of hair follicles with the hollow harvesting punch during the FUE procedure. The harvesting procedure described in the Rassman patent teaches the users to align an axis of the harvesting instrument along the axis of the follicular unit to be extracted.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the invention, a method for orienting a tool for harvesting follicular units with a follicular unit to be harvested is provided. In some embodiments, the method comprises determining an emergence angle of a FU of interest; choosing a minimal approach angle of a tool for harvesting follicular units; comparing the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and orienting the tool relative to the FU of interest based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool. In some embodiments, orienting the tool comprises automatically moving a robotic arm to which the tool is operatively connected. In other embodiments, orienting the tool comprises manually orienting a hand-held tool, for example, by actuating an adjustment mechanism.

According to another aspect of the invention, a method for harvesting follicular units from a body surface is provided. Such method comprises positioning a harvesting tool having a lumen over a FU to be harvested, the FU having an elongated axis; orienting the harvesting tool relative to the elongated axis of the FU based on a result of a comparison of an emergence angle of the FU with a selected minimum approach angle of the harvesting tool; inserting the harvesting tool into the body surface about the FU to be harvested; and removing the FU.

According to still another aspect of the invention, a method for orienting a tool for transplanting follicular units relative to a body surface is provided. In some embodiments the method comprises determining an emergence angle of a FU of interest; selecting or using a pre-selected minimum approach angle of a tool; comparing the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and orienting the tool relative to the FU of interest based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool. In some embodiments, the tool is a hair implantation tool and the method is directed to orienting the hair implantation tool relative to the implantation site.

According to a further aspect of the invention, another method for orienting a tool for implanting follicular units is provided. This method is especially useful when there is none or a very limited number of the pre-existing follicular units present at the implantation site. In some embodiments, the method comprises using fiducial markers to generate one or more virtual FUs having an emergence angle; selecting or using a pre-selected minimum approach angle of a implanting tool for implanting follicular units; identifying the emergence angle of the one or more virtual FUs to be not less than the minimum approach angle of the implanting tool; and orienting the implanting tool with the identified emergence angle of the one or more virtual FUs.

According to yet another aspect, a method for orienting a tool for transplanting follicular units is provided. The method comprises choosing a minimum approach angle of a tool based at least in part on an average or mean emergence angle of a plurality of follicular units in an area; determining an emergence angle of a follicular unit of interest; comparing the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool; determining orientation the tool based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool. The method may further comprise orienting the tool based on the results of the comparison described above. The above method may be implemented, for example, in hair harvesting procedure, hair implantation procedure, or other procedures on a patient where a tool approach angle needs to be determined or effectively modified. In reference to hair transplantation, the step of orienting the tool may comprise orienting the tool relative to the follicular unit of interest or orienting the tool relative to a recipient area where a hair graft to be implanted. The method may further comprise modifying the minimum approach angle based on an actual emergence angle of a particular follicular unit of interest and/or various additional criteria. For example, the method may comprise modifying at least one minimum approach angle associated with a mean or average emergence angle by using interpolation and at least two default minimum tool approach angles.

A yet further aspect of the invention provides a system for hair transplantation, comprising an interface adapted to receive an image data containing a data associated with a follicular unit (FU); and an image processor comprising one or more modules for executing operations on the image data, the one or more modules including instructions for determining an emergence angle of the FU; selecting a minimum approach angle of a tool (e.g., a tool for harvesting follicular units); comparing the emergence angle of the FU with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and determining orientation and/or orienting the tool based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool. In some embodiments, the minimum approach angle of a tool may be based at least in part on an average or mean emergence angle of a plurality of follicular units in an area. The system may further include an image acquisition device. In some embodiments, the system is a robotic system, in other embodiments the system is configured for use with hand-held device, for example hand-held hair transplantation devices.

Another system of the present invention comprises an image acquisition device and a processor, the processor configured for determining an emergence angle of a FU of interest; choosing a minimal approach angle of a tool; comparing the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and orienting the tool based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool. In some embodiments, the minimum approach angle of a tool may be based at least in part on an average or mean emergence angle of a plurality of follicular units in an area.

An article of manufacture comprising a machine-accessible medium including data that, when accessed by a machine, cause the machine to perform operations, comprising determining an emergence angle of a FU of interest, the FU of interest; choosing a minimal approach angle of a tool for harvesting follicular units; comparing the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and orienting the tool relative to the FU of interest based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool.

According to one general aspect, systems and methods are provided for determining the need to modify and/or modifying orientation of a tool relative to an object on a body in at least partially automated procedure. The modification may be accomplished automatically or semi-automatically, for example, by a processor with or without user input. In some embodiments, the systems and methods comprise providing or processing information to enable modification of a tool approach angle, if certain conditions are met.

Systems and methods of the present invention may be implemented for use with manual, partially automated and fully automated, including robotic, systems and procedures for removal of biological units, including hair harvesting and/or transplantation. Other and further objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when read in view of the accompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features and advantages of the present invention will become appreciated as the same become better understood with reference to the specification, claims, and appended drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates follicular unit extraction method according to the prior art and hair follicle transaction associated with such method;

FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of one example of the robotic system for use with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart demonstrating one example of the surface fit process according to the invention;

FIGS. 4A and 4B are schematic views showing an emergence angle of the follicular unit(s) of interest and a tool approach angle;

FIGS. 5A and 5B demonstrate examples of the tool orientation relative to the FUs according to the invention;

FIG. 5C is an example of the graph representing one embodiment of the methodology for determining minimum approach angles for the representative emergence angles of follicular units.

FIG. 5D is an example of the method for modifying the graph of FIG. 5.

FIG. 6 is a schematic depiction of one example of use of the surface fit modeling in hair implantation according to the invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic depiction of another example of use of the surface fit modeling in hair implantation according to the invention; and

FIG. 8 is a schematic view of an exemplary embodiment of a hair harvesting/implantation system for use with hand-held devices for hair transplantation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following Detailed Description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that show by way of illustration some exemplary embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In this regard, directional terminology, such as “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “distal,” “proximal,” “outer,” “inner,” “higher,” “lower,” “first,” “second,” etc., are used with reference to the orientation of the Figure(s) being described. Because components or embodiments of the present invention can be positioned in a number of different orientations, the directional terminology is used for purposes of illustration and is in no way limiting. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

The adjective “automated” with reference to a system or process as a whole means that some part or all of a particular system or step in the process involves an autonomous mechanism or function; i.e., that mechanism or function does not require manual actuation. Ultimately, one or more steps in the procedure may be automated, or autonomous, with some parts requiring manual input. This definition encompasses an automated system that requires only an operator to depress an ON switch or schedule the operation, and also a system in which hand held tools are used but some mechanism of the system functions autonomously, i.e., without human input, to perform a function. Some of the automated systems described herein may also be robotically-assisted or computer/software/machine-instruction controlled. The devices and methods of the present invention are useful in manual procedures and systems, as well as in automated procedures and system. The tools of the present invention could be used with the robotically-assisted systems and procedures. The adverb “automatically” when referring to use of a particular component of a system or a particular step in a process means that such step is accomplished autonomously, i.e., without real-time manual assistance.

The term “tool,” or “harvesting tool,” or “implanting tool”, as used herein in reference to hair transplantation, refers to any number of tools or end effectors that are capable of removing or harvesting follicular units (“FUs”) from a body surface, creating an implantation sites, or implanting FU into the body surface. In this sense, a body surface can be attached to the body or may be a flap of skin or body tissue removed from the body. Such tools may have many different forms and configurations. In many embodiments, the tool comprises a hollow tubular shaft and thus may be labeled, for example, a cannula, a needle, or a punch. Other tools applicable for alternative procedures that could benefit from the inventions of the present application may comprise, for example, lasers, or tattoo removal tools, surgical instruments, electrosurgical or ablation tools, eye instruments, or drills. The terms “operatively connected,” “coupled,” or “mounted,” or “attached” as used herein, means directly or indirectly coupled, attached, or mounted through one or more intervening components.

As mentioned above, though the invention is particularly useful in hair harvesting and implantation to provide devices and methods for harvesting and implanting follicular units (FUs), it is not limited to hair transplantation. Other procedures that require a model of the patient's skin surface, where said skin surface is assumed to have some hair, or where it is desirable to orient a particular tool for insertion into a body or an organ (such as an eye, vein, artery) and control and adjust such tool orientation as needed, may benefit from the system and method of the inventions described herein. One example of applicability of the invention is in diagnostic skin imaging for cosmetic or other medical purposes. In some applications, the invention may be used with a vision system designed to track hair growth over a long period of time (e.g. each individual hair receives a fingerprint, with one part of this fingerprint being the hair's natural emergence angle). For convenience of description, the following description will be discussed by example in reference to hair transplantation procedures. It should be noted, however, that such description is for the purposes of illustration and example only and is not intended to be exhaustive or limiting.

FIG. 1 illustrates certain problems associated with the existing devices for follicular unit harvesting. During follicular extraction technique, the operator aligns a harvesting punch substantially parallel with the visible portion of the hairs protruding above the skin, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,572,625. The punch is then pushed into the skin, often with significant force. As seen in FIG. 1, each follicle 1 of the follicular unit (“FU”) has a hair bulb 2 (a subsurface bottom-most portion) and a hair shaft 3, the hair shaft extends through the epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous fat layers of the skin. The hair bulb 2 represents one of the critical structures of the follicle that contain follicular stem cells and melanocytes, other critical structures (not shown) include, for example, sebaceous glands, outer root sheath. When harvesting follicular units for subsequent implantation in another area, it is important not to damage these critical structures.

One of the limitations, however, of the FUE-based devices and methods is caused by the fact that the hair follicles do not maintain the same direction of growth under the skin. Quite often a hair follicle significantly changes its direction or angle underneath the skin. As seen in FIG. 1, the orientation of the portion of hair shaft 3 above the skin differs from the orientation of the portion of the hair shaft 3 below the skin. It should be noted that the following description refers to follicular units or FUs, which are naturally occurring aggregates of one of more hair follicles (typically, 1 to 4). While each hair follicle within a follicular unit typically has its own axis and direction above and below the skin surface, for simplicity we will refer to the axis of the follicular unit as a whole, which would represent an average or mean axis of visible portions of all hair follicles in the follicular unit. Generally, it has been observed that an emergence angle of the FU from the skin is quite often smaller/more acute than its subcutaneous course, however, in some instances it may be the other way around. As a result, aligning the hair harvesting tool 4 with the visible axis of the FU above the skin and advancing the punch based on the visible portion of the hair follicle above the skin, may result in FU transection, damaging it or rendering it unusable. As seen in FIG. 1, advancing the hair harvesting tool 4 along the axis of the hair shaft 3 at an acute (relatively small or shallow) angle resulted in transecting (cutting off) a portion of the hair follicle below the skin level containing the hair bulb 2.

It has also been observed that a tool, such as a hollow punch directed at the scalp at high velocity and aligned with a hair follicle positioned at an acute/rather small angle: 1) will tend to skive the skin; 2) will create an inconsistent and undesirable asymmetric incision in the skin. For example, the leading edge of the punch will make an incision deeper into the skin than the opposing edge. This is undesirable because the deeper incision with the leading edge may cut into the follicle. This action has been observed with high speed photovideography and clinically.

To avoid or substantially reduce the problems described above, a technique is developed as described herein. The benefits of the described systems and methods includes reduction of the transection rates of follicles during harvesting, preventing harvesting needles from sliding on the body surface (e.g. scalp), scraping the skin surface, or insufficiently penetrating the skin surface due to the acute angles at which needle may approach the surface, as well as improving esthetic results during hair implantation. The “approach angle” of the needle with respect to the body surface, for example, a scalp (as described in more detail in reference to FIG. 4A), is important in both harvest and implant processes. During harvesting, it is desirable to avoid those follicles that are lying almost flat against the scalp, because the needle will tend to skive along the skin during puncture, thereby increasing transection rates. During implantation, it is desirable to match the angles of the existing follicles so that newly implanted hair follicles blend in more naturally.

In both cases it is beneficial to compute a model of the patient scalp (or other relevant body surface) in real-time, and use this model to measure the emergence angle of existing hairs in the field-of-view (FOV) of the camera, as well as the approach angle of the needle with respect to said body surface. In some embodiments, the body surface model is parameterized utilizing a planar model (i.e. represent the patient's scalp as a plane). In other embodiments, the model accounts for the body curvatures and 3D dimensions. Therefore, solutions disclosed herein are in no way limited to the described particular models, provided as examples only.

FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of one example of the robotic system 20 that could be implemented with the methodology of the inventions described herein. The system 20 includes a robotic arm 22 and an assembly 24 mounted, for example, for rotation on a down tube 26 of the robotic arm. Various arrows are shown to illustrate the movement capabilities of the system 20. Various motors and other movement devices may be incorporated in the assembly 24 to enable fine movements of an operating tip of a tool 28 in multiple directions. The exemplary robotic system 20 further includes at least one imaging acquisition device 29, which is described in more detail below. The image acquisition device may be mounted in a fixed position, or it may be coupled (directly or indirectly) to a robotic arm or other controllable motion device. The operating tip of the tool 28 is shown positioned over a body surface 30, in this case a part of the patient scalp having hair follicles thereon. The tool 28 is any number of the harvesting and/or implanting tools useful for, respectively, removing and/or implanting follicular units from and into the body surface 30. In some embodiments, the harvesting and the implanting tool may be combined in one tool, in other embodiments, these tools may be separate tools.

100371 A processor 32 of FIG. 2, comprises an image processor for processing images obtained from the image acquisition device 29. The processor 32 may also instruct the various movement devices of the robotic arm 22 and the assembly 24, including the harvesting/implanting tool, and act, for example, through a robotic control 34 as schematically shown in FIG. 2. The robotic control 34 may be operatively coupled to the robotic arm and configured to control the motion of the robotic arm, including the motion based on the images or data acquired by the image acquisition device. Alternatively, robotic control 34 may be incorporated as a part of the processor 32, so that all processing and controls of all movements of all the tools, including harvesting tools, the robotic arm and any other moveable pails of the assembly, including those based on the images or data acquired by the image acquisition device, are concentrated in one place. The system 20 may further comprise a monitor 35, keyboard 36, and a mouse 38. The system further comprises an interface adapted to receive an image data, various parts of the system allow an operator to monitor conditions and provide instructions, as needed. A magnified image of the body surface 30 can be seen on the monitor 35. In addition, the system may comprise other tools, devices and components useful in harvesting, and/or implantation of the FU, or in hair treatment planning.

Some non-limiting examples of an image acquisition device 29 shown in FIG. 2 include one or more cameras, such as any commercially available cameras. The image acquisition device may take still images, or it could be a video recording device (such as a camcorder) or any other image acquisition device or sensor. While stereo or multi-view imaging devices are very useful in the systems and methods described herein, it is not necessary to employ such geometries or configurations, and the concepts described herein are not so limited. Likewise, although it is preferred that the image acquisition device be a digital device, it is not necessary. For example, the image acquisition device could be an analog TV camera that acquires an initial image which is then processed into a digital image (for example, via an analog-to-digital device like a commercial-off-the-shelf frame grabber) for further use in the methods of the invention. The image acquisition device may be coupled to a processing system, shown incorporated in the processor 32 in FIG. 2, to control the imaging operation and process image data.

The image processor, which sometimes may be referred to as a processor, may comprise any suitable device programmed and configured to perform the methods described herein. It may incorporate a single or multiple processors to control various subsystems and provide the user interface. For example, the image processor may be programmed with software configured to perform the methods of the invention as further described in more detail. By way of example, and not limitation, a suitable image processor may be a digital processing system which includes one or more processors or other type of device. An image processor may be a controller or any type of personal computer (“PC”). Alternatively, the image processor may comprise an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) or Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). The image processor may also include memory, storage devices, and other components generally known in the art and, therefore, they do not need to be described in detail here.

Description of the Surface Fit Process and Emergence Angle Determination

According to one aspect of the invention, the method for modeling skin or body surface topology from images is provided. The flow chart of FIG. 3 illustrates an example of one embodiment of a surface fitting process used in the inventions described herein. Image acquisition device, for example, as described in reference to FIG. 2 may be used to obtain images of the body surface containing follicular units. In one embodiment, two cameras are used to obtain two stereo grayscale images with each image acquisition event, for example, left and right grayscale images (100). The acquired images are segmented (110). Segmentation may be accomplished, for example, using image segmentation software. Because of physical attributes of a hair follicular unit, its base (i.e., the end emerging from the dermis) can be readily distinguished from its tip as part of the image segmentation process. For example, the base portion has a different profile and is generally thicker than the distal tip portion. Also, a shadow of the follicular unit can typically be identified which, by definition, is “attached” at the base. At (120) stereo reconstruction is performed to locate the position of one or more follicular units of interest present in the field of view (FOV). For example, one process of stereo reconstruction that could be used in the present invention is described in the commonly owned co-pending patent application published as US 2007/0106306A1 on May 10, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference. According to the above-mentioned process, the locations of the centers of the hair follicles are identified and matched in both the left and right rectified images. Each follicle has a “tail”—the point at which the hair exits the body surface, e.g. scalp, and a “head”—the tip of the hair shaft. The head and tail of each hair follicle is identified in both the left and right images, wherein the three dimensional coordinates of the head and tail of the hair follicle may be calculated. By utilizing known camera geometry, 3D coordinates of each relevant FU is determined, including 3D coordinates of each tail and head are determined. Stereo reconstruction is just one example of locating the position of follicular units of interest. For example, it is possible to obtain 3D information about the follicles in the field-of-view by utilizing more than two images. Alternatively, 3D data may also be obtained from one or more grayscale pictures by augmenting the vision system with a laser “range-finder” device.

Once a list of relevant hair follicles and the 3D coordinates of their heads and tails is known, a surface fit to the tail coordinates of the FU may be performed (130). In the example of FIG. 3, it is assumed that the portion of the scalp being imaged is flat and the surface fit is performed using, for example, a least-squares technique. In the example shown the surface represents the patient scalp. The set of tail positions may be fit to a function of the following form:

[equation 1]

Ax+By+Cz+D=0   (1)

Equation 1 defines a plane and hence the system represents the patient's scalp as a planar surface. In general the fitting function could be that of a higher-order polynomial (e.g. a 2^(nd) order quadric, or higher) that takes into account the natural curvature of the scalp. Alternatively, one could fit a mesh to the set of tail positions, which would be useful for a generally curved surface with a fair amount of “local bumps” and “grooves,” for example, due to the application of topical anesthetic or tumescence in case of hair transplantation procedures. While the example above employs the least-squares technique to perform the surface fit, any number of mathematical analyses well known to those skilled in the art may also be used.

The surface model (planar surface, quadric, higher-order polynomial, mesh, parametric, etc.) may be used to compute an “emergence angle” for each follicle unit of interest and a “tool approach angle” of the tool used in the procedure (e.g. hair harvesting tool, site making tool, hair implantation tool). FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate the above angles for a planar fit example. Higher-order polynomial fits, such as a quadric, would use the tangent plane at the point-of-contact with the scalp surface to compute the emergence angle measurement. In FIG. 4A, θ_(N) represents an approach angle of the tool 150 (such as a needle) from the body surface, such as scalp. In FIG. 4B, θ_(F1) represents an emergence angle of the hair follicle 1 from the scalp, while θ_(F2) represents an emergence angle of the hair follicle 2 from the scalp, and an N arrow represents a vector normal to the scalp surface.

The description above is based on how to surface fit “small” regions of the skin, for example, patient's scalp, where “small” is a region of the scalp on the order of approximately 1 cm². For significantly larger regions, for example, an area of 3.5 cm², a planar assumption may not work because in reality the body surface, especially the surface of the head, is not flat but curved. In this case, the curvature may be approximated by fitting the hair tail coordinates to a 2D semispherical surface, described mathematically as a 2D quadric. The measured follicle tail coordinates may be taken and a quadric fitting to a 2D parabola of the form may be performed, for example, as follows:

z=A+R(x−x ₀)²+R(y−y ₀)²,

where the apex of the parabolic surface is (x₀, y₀), its value at the apex is A, and the radius-of-curvature of the patient's scalp in the imaged region is R.

Usage of Surface Fit Process in Harvesting of Follicular Units

It was determined that there exists a cut-off point (or a range of cut-off points for various body surfaces) at which the risk of transection becomes high if one tries to fully align a tool, such as a needle, with a given hair whose emergence angle θ, is too small. FIG. 5A depicts this situation. Follicular unit F₁ has “above the skin” shaft portion 162, “below the skin” shaft portion 164 and an emergence angle θ_(F1). As could be seen from FIG. 5A, the emergence angle θ_(F1) is fairly acute, and there is a substantial difference between the directions of the shaft portions 162 and 164, the below the skin shaft portion 164 having less acute subcutaneous direction. The follicular unit F₂, on the other hand, has more upright emergence angle and its “above the skin” and subcutaneous portions of the shaft are closer to parallel. The risk of transection for follicle F₁ is comparatively higher than that of F₂ because F₁ is shown lying almost flat on the scalp. When fully aligned to F₁, the tool 160, such as a harvesting needle, will have a greater propensity to skive or shave along the surface during the puncture. Moreover since the shaft and the bulb underneath this follicle is more closely oriented to the surface normal then what might be suspected given the shaft's orientation out of the skin, the chance of the tool 160 transecting F₁ is comparatively greater. In contrast, if the needle 160 completely aligns to F₂, a risk of transecting this follicle is reduced because it is more likely that the tool 160 will be following the subcutaneous direction of the follicle F₂. Therefore, for successful procedure, an angle at which the tool should be oriented relative to the F1 will be different from the angle at which the tool should be oriented relative to the F2.

While performing hair harvesting, especially when using an automated system, such as a robotic system, it is often desirable to stretch the skin around the area of location of the follicular unit to be harvested. This could be done using a skin tensioner device. It has been observed that when the skin tensioner device is used, it tends to even further reduce the emergence angle of the follicles in the area where the skin tensioner device is applied. For example, in some cases, skin tensioner device application reduces the emergence angle of the relevant FUs in the range of 5-12 degrees, in some cases in the range of 7-10 degrees. That is, if the “natural” emergence angle of the hair at issue is 50 degrees, then after application of the skin tensioner device, the emergence angle measures at approximately 43 degrees. As a result it even further increases the number of hair follicles which will be potentially transected if the user aligns the tool with such hair follicles. Similarly, injection of saline into the donor/recipient area or using hair gels or any other form of hair styling may cause changes in the “natural” emergence angle of hairs. Skin tensioning devices, hair styling gels and lotions, and saline injections may be used not only in the robotic hair transplantation procedures but also with partially automated procedures and procedures using hand-held devices, therefore, this issue of a large number of follicular units having an emergence angle, for example, of 45° or less, or otherwise distorted emergence angle, is applicable to all types of the hair transplantation procedures.

FIG. 5B illustrates a method of orienting the tool relative to the FU of interest according to one embodiment of the invention. Based on various factors and certain characteristics, including the geometry and design of the tool or mechanism used in the procedure, the force required to facilitate the desired skin surface penetration, characteristics of the body surface or area in which the follicular units reside, characteristics of the follicular units, experience, measurements of the emergence angles of the existing hair in the relevant area, it was determined that there exists a cut-off tool approach angle θ_(c)(also referred to as minimum approach angle of a tool or angle clamp) below which the tool shall not be aligned with the relevant FU. It is so because, for example, the risk of transection, not cutting the tissue, or creating asymmetric dissections becomes too high. In other words, if the emergence angle of the follicle is less than θ_(c), instead of aligning the axis of the tool with the visible portion of the shaft of the follicular unit, the user may orient the tool with such cut-off tool approach angle θ_(c). It is suggested that the cut-off or minimum tool approach angle θ_(c) must be selected in the range of, approximately, 40° to 65° and preferably, in the range of 45° to 55°, and even more preferably, in the range of 50° to 55° for certain tools and applications. As a practical matter, a vast majority of the harvested hair, especially when employing the skin tensioner, will have an emergence angle smaller than the suggested θ_(c). In these situations, a tool may be oriented relative to the FU of interest by restricting the orientation angle of the needle to be not less than the cut-off approach angle θ_(c) In certain applications, it may be desirable, for the reasons mentioned above, to add approximately 15-20° to the emergence angle of the relevant existing hair follicle to determine a desirable minimum approach angle θ_(c). For example, if the hair emergence angle is 35°, a minimum approach angle of about 50° may be used to produce acceptable harvesting results. The value of the minimum approach angle can be determined, for example, for a particular area on the body. Typically, the smaller the emergence angle of a particular FU, the higher the difference between the emergence angle of this FU and a minimum tool approach angle θ_(c).

In FIGS. 5A and 5B, in the case of F₁, because θ_(F1)<θ_(c), the system does not align to the F₁ hair vector and instead orients the axis of the needle or punch 160″ assuming that the F₁'s emergence angle is θc. The calculation for positioning the needle precisely within the plane formed by F₁ perpendicular to the scalp surface uses the normal to the surface N.

According to one aspect of the invention as described above, a method of orienting a tool for harvesting is provided. Such method could be used in procedures using systems, such an a robotic system shown as an example in FIG. 2, as well as various other automated, partially automated or manual systems, including using a hand-held devices, as described below in reference to FIG. 8. As a preliminary step, an image of the follicular unit(s) of interest is obtained. That may be accomplished by any technique known in the art. For example, in some embodiments a robotic arm (or a portable device in the physician's hand) with the attached image acquisition device may be positioned so that the harvesting or implantation region is in focus for the cameras. According to one embodiment of the method, an emergence angle of a FU of interest is determined, a minimal approach angle of a tool for harvesting follicular units is chosen and the emergence angle of the FU of interest is compared with the minimum approach angle of the tool. Based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool, the tool is oriented relative to the FU of interest. If the emergence angle of the FU of interest is less than the selected minimum approach angle, the tool is oriented to the minimum approach angle, and it is not aligned with the actual emergence angle of the FU. In some embodiments, the tool may be oriented by automatically moving a robotic arm to which the tool is coupled. In other embodiments an adjustment mechanism is actuated to orient a hand-held tool according to the above method. Various examples of the adjustment mechanism are described in reference to FIG. 8.

In some embodiments, in order to increase the throughput of a system, an emergence angle of a FU of interest may be determined as a group representative emergence angle based on the information from a plurality or a group of follicular units of interest. For example, an image of the group/plurality of follicular units is first obtained. As before, this may be accomplished by any technique known in the art. The emergence angle of each of follicular units in the group, or a representative number of, or a predetermined number of the group of follicular units may be determined, and an average or mean value of the determined emergence angle calculated. A minimal approach angle of a tool, for example a tool for harvesting follicular units, is chosen and the average or mean value of the determined emergence angle of the group of follicular units (which is now used to represent an emergence angle of a FU of interest) is compared with the minimum approach angle of the tool. Based on a result of the above comparison, the tool is oriented relative to each of the follicular units of the group at the same approach angle. In this manner the number of re-orientations that the tool has to undergo during a treatment session can be minimized, and efficiency increased. As stated before, if the determined “group representative” emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is less than the selected minimum approach angle, the tool is oriented to the minimum approach angle. A similar approach applies when used with a hair implantation tool.

As previously explained, various ranges of the minimum tool approach angles may be chosen depending on a particular application or location of one or more of follicular units, or when used for hair implantation as described below, it could be based on a location of an implantation site. In some embodiments, the minimum approach angle of the tool may vary depending upon the general or specific location of a follicular unit or a group of follicular units. For example the minimum approach angle at the top of the scalp may be different to the minimum approach angle at the sides or the back of the scalp. In other embodiments, the minimum approach angle of the harvesting (or implantation) tool may be based upon a linear, stepped, polynomial or other function of the determined emergence angle of one or more of follicular units, including those located near the implantation site and/or “virtual hairs” as described in reference to implantation of follicular units.

According to another embodiment, the following logic for the angle adjustment and tool orientation may be implemented. The current minimum approach angle is compared to the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest and the following logic may be applied based on the results of such comparison:

a) If the current minimum approach angle is higher than the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest, then the current minimum approach angle may be used as the actual tool approach angle for that particular follicular unit. However, as an example, the following modification may be super-imposed on this initial logic. For example, if the difference between the minimum approach angle and the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is less than a selected number of degrees (e.g., 5° or 10°), it may be desirable to choose a tool approach angle which is substantially equal to the sum of the selected number of degrees and the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest.

b) If the current minimum approach angle is the same or lower than the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest, then the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest may be used as the tool approach angle. However, again the following modification may be super-imposed on this initial logic. For example, it may be desirable to choose the tool approach angle which is substantially equal to the sum of the selected number of degrees and the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest. In some instances, if the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is greater than the minimum approach angle by more than a predetermined value, the tool may be oriented to an angle that is above the minimum approach angle but not more than a sum of the minimum approach angle and the predetermined value (e.g., an angle equal to a sum of the minimum approach angle and the predetermined value).

Below are some examples of the above implementations. Assume that the user desires that a difference between the emergence angle of any particular follicular unit and the actual tool approach angle should be always at least 5°. In this case, if the angle clamp is set at 55° and a particular follicular unit has a slightly lower emergence angle of 52° (the difference between the two angles is less than 5°, then the tool approach angle will be automatically set by the system at 57° (52°+5°=57°. Alternatively, if the angle clamp is the same (55°) but a particular FU has a higher emergence angle (e.g. 58°), then the tool approach angle will be automatically set by the system at 63° (58°+5°=63°).

According to another aspect, in some embodiments it may be desirable to base the determination of the minimum approach angle on the average or mean value of emergence angles of a plurality of the existing hair in the particular relevant area. By examining closely the hairs in a relatively small area, for example, of the scalp or another body surface, it was observed that follicular units might not be pointing exactly in the same direction. Therefore, it may be beneficial to average an emergence angle of follicular units in a selected neighborhood (e.g., 100 hair graft or more; visible hair on a screen of a user display, or within 25 mm radius of a selected follicular unit, etc.). Averaging eliminates individual noise, hairstyling difference, or with reference to the robotic systems it increases the speed and efficiency of the procedure because it requires less reorientation and movement of the tool. For example, in some embodiments an emergence angle is determined for each follicular unit in a small region of a surface, such as scalp, and then mean or average emergence angle is calculated for that particular region. Such average emergence angle may be then used to determine a suggested minimum approach angle or angle clamp for that area. However, while it will work properly for most follicular units in that particular area, it may still not be suitable to use with a particular follicular unit of interest. For example, it may not work for a certain follicular unit located within the relevant area whose emergence angle is substantially different than the determined average emergence angle for the follicular units in that area. For such follicular unit, it may be desirable to adjust the suggested default minimum approach angle.

According to one approach, the following method of automation of the angle clamp determination based on the mean or average emergence angles may be implemented as will be described in reference to FIG. 5 c. FIG. 5 c illustrates a graphical representation of the proposed angle clamps (minimum tool approach angles) corresponding to a particular average emergence angle of follicular units. This graph 170 allows to choose automatically a default angle clamp for the corresponding emergence angle of the follicular unit and it may be created according to the following method. The user or the processor (for example, based on stored information, statistical data, or otherwise), selects a first minimum approach angle A1 (at) 40°) which corresponds to an average emergence angle of a plurality of follicular units with a first relatively shallow emergence angle (e.g., 20°), and a second minimum approach angle A2 (at 65°) which corresponds to an average emergence angle of another plurality of follicular units with a second relatively high emergence angle (e.g., 60°). The processor may interpolate, in this example linearly, between these two values A1 and A2, creating the graph 170 which provides suggested minimum approach angles for the average emergence angles of follicular units that lie between the first and the second minimum approach angles, 20° and 60° respectively. This interpolation, although shown to be linear in the example of FIG. 5 c, may be quadratic, cubic or any other type or combination of types of interpolation, and instead of two points A1 and A2, a different number of the initial points may be selected. Further, additional adjustments to the proposed minimum approach angle of the default graph may be implemented if desired. For example, the proposed minimum approach angle may be increased or decreased by a particular number of degrees and this adjustment may be super-imposed on the automated calculation of the default angles clamps. Having created this graphical representation, the processor is able to find the associated minimum approach angle for any follicular unit average emergence angle, and use that value when comparing the emergence angle of the actual follicular unit of interest. Based on the comparison of the values, the processor can then automatically or semi-automatically change the angle of the tool, and even instruct the corresponding tool orientation. If the orientation is not to the user's liking, he/she may modify the orientation or the graphical representation to meet his/her needs.

According to the inventions described herein, the minimum approach angle or the angle clamp may be chosen automatically for a wide variety of patients with an understanding that these patients may have a wide variety of follicular unit emergence angles in various areas, of the scalp or other body surface. For example, on the same patient, depending on the location of the follicular unit, the follicular unit emergence angle may vary from low angles below 25 degrees to the relatively high angles of 60 degrees and even more. Nevertheless, any automated algorithm, including the one described above, however widely applicable it may be, may not work in some special cases, and therefore, would need to be adjusted. Such adjustment of the default automation algorithm may be accomplished, for example, in the following different ways.

According to one implementation, the system may allow to switch from an automatic minimum approach angle calculation to a manual mode, and back to the automated mode. For example, the user may elect to temporarily or permanently terminate the program responsible for automatically determining the angle clamp, (or automatically orientating the tool), and switch to manual selection, where the user selects the angle at which the tool will be oriented, or alternatively, an angle clamp, for example, as it penetrates the body surface to harvest the follicular unit of interest. According to another implementation, the user may interactively adjust the above described default automation algorithm. In this embodiment the user may be provided with a user interface via which he/she may modify the orientation of the tool directly or indirectly. For example, the user interface may comprise a graphical representation in which a plot of average follicular unit emergence angle against minimum tool approach angle is illustrated, and the user may interactively adjust one or more values on the graphical representation, which is turn adjusts operation of the tool orientation. This implementation will require computer-savvy advanced users. Alternatively, according to yet further implementation, a combination of the manual and automated adjustment may be implemented as described below. Specifically, an adjustment of the automation algorithm may be based on user input for a specific follicular unit as will be described in reference to FIG. 5 d.

According to one implementation, the user input could adjust, for example, one proposed angle clamp that is closest to one of the points used in the interpolation (e.g., points A1 or A2 of FIG. 5 c), while keeping the rest the same or appropriately adjusted. In one embodiment, the user may desire that the minimum approach angle for a particular selected follicular unit be changed such that based on this input the graph of FIG. 5 c is adjusted, and then the system continues to provide automation of this parameter. A typical user input with respect to a particular follicular unit will be one of the following two:

-   -   1. Minimum approach angle (angle clamp) needs to be smaller or         more shallow for the specific follicular unit, or     -   2. Minimum approach angle needs to be higher for the specific         follicular unit.         Both of these situations may be handled in a similar manner.         When a user wants the angle clamp for a particular follicular         unit to be smaller/more acute/more shallow, it generally means         that the angle clamp needs to be decreased for this specific         follicular unit by a small amount (e.g., five degrees), and for         all other follicular units the system may automatically         decrement the angle clamp by an appropriate amount and         reconstruct the graph accordingly. This is illustrated in FIG. 5         d, where a default solid line 170 represents a graph of         suggested minimum approach angles for a range of average         emergence angles of follicular units, the default graph 170         created for example, as described in reference to FIG. 5 c.         Let's say the user provides input for follicular unit having the         emergence angles of 35° to be more acute/shallow than the         default, for example, by 5°, as illustrated by a point 180 in         FIG. 5 d. The point 180 that now represents a new adjusted         minimum approach angle (45° instead of the default 50° in this         example) for the follicular units with the emergence angle of         35°. The user may utilize a user interface or remote control to         input the change for a point 180, or it may instruct the system         to subtract (in this example) a few degrees from the default         value. Of course, in other examples, instead of subtracting the         user may increase the default value by adding a desired number         of degrees, or simply by dragging the point of interest on the         graph, or by any other appropriate means. The processor is then         able to automatically adjust other minimum approach angles and         reconstruct the graph based on this new adjusted point 180 and         by keeping the original default 65° angle clamp for the 60°         average emergence angle of FU. This new adjusted graph is         illustrated with the dashed line 185, where the value of the         minimum approach angle has been appropriately adjusted for all         values of the emergence angles in-between new input point 180         and the original input for 65° angle clamp.

Conversely, if the user wants to adjust a minimum approach angle for a particular follicular unit to be greater, for example, by 5° higher than the default, this situation is illustrated by the alternative dashed line 195 in FIG. 5 d. In this example, the user provided new input for adjustment of the minimum approach angle to be raised to 65° for the follicular unit having 50° emergence angle—see point 190. The processor is then able to automatically adjust other minimum approach angles and reconstruct the graph based on this new adjusted point 190 and by keeping the original default 40° angle clamp for the 20° average emergence angle of FU. This new adjusted graph is illustrated with the dashed line 195, where the value of the minimum approach angle has been appropriately adjusted for all values of the emergence angles in-between new input point 190 and the original input for 40° angle clamp.

As shown in the adjusted graphs 185 and 195 of FIG. 5 d, in both cases the user input is elegantly used in applying automated determination of the appropriate minimum approach angles and automatically or semi-automatically adjusting the angle parameter accordingly.

It will be appreciated that although the embodiment above has been described with respect to a minimum approach angle, a maximum approach angle (or maximum angle clamp) can also be determined and used in some embodiments. This maximum approach angle can be used, for example, to dictate the tool angle that should be utilized for follicular units that emerge at an angle above the maximum approach angle. For example, a maximum clamp angle of 65 to 70 degrees (e.g., 67°)may be imposed, such that for a follicular unit that emerges from the body surface at 75 degrees, the tool will be orientated at 67 degrees, and not to 75 degrees, even though 75 degrees is above the minimum clamp angle.

It should be noted that although many of the above examples and embodiments related to hair transplantation describe the tool being oriented relative to a follicular unit of interest, in other instances the tool may be oriented relative to an implantation site, or recipient area where a hair graft is to be implanted. It will be apparent that controlling and adjusting the orientation of a tool during an automated or semi-automated procedure and various examples and descriptions provided above are useful and applicable not only for hair harvesting or removal, but also for orienting the tool for making an implantation site, or for implanting hair. It is also applicable to applications other than hair transplantation, such as those already mentioned in the description, and including, for instance, procedures involving orientation of a needle for insertion into a body or an organ, such as an eye, or orienting a needle or other instrument relative to a vein or artery, and modifying the approach angle to compensate, for example, for motion or breathing.

According to yet another aspect of the present application, a method for harvesting follicular units from a body surface is provided. Such method comprises positioning a harvesting tool having a lumen over a FU of interest. Such FU of interest has an elongated axis. The method further comprises orienting the harvesting tool relative to the elongated axis of the FU based on a result of a comparison of an emergence angle of the FU with a selected minimum approach angle of the harvesting tool. The harvesting tool is inserted into the body surface about the FU of interest to be harvested and the FU is removed from the body surface. Determining an emergence angle of the FU may be accomplished by using image-generated topological skin models, as described above. Orienting the harvesting tool may be accomplished automatically using, for example, a robotic system, or it could be done manually if a hand-held tool is used as described below in reference to FIG. 8.

Usage of Surface Fit Process in Implantation of Follicular Units

During implantation, to improve quality and appearance of the implanted hair grafts, it is desirable to figure out the location and desired orientation (or emergence angle) of the hair follicles to be implanted based on the density, location and emergence angles of the pre-existing hair in the area of the implant sites (recipient area), for those cases where pre-existing hair exists near the implant sites. However, as with the hair harvesting, if the emergence angle of the pre-existing hair is very low, such as below, for example 40-45°, matching the approach angle of the implantation tool to the emergence angles of the pre-existing hair may be undesirable and will not provide satisfactory results. For example, approaching the body surface, such as scalp with the implantation tool at very low angles may result in the tool sliding, scraping the scalp, or not penetrating to the desired depth, and therefore preventing correct implantation. To eliminate these situations, the following method has been developed. According to some embodiments of the invention, bald spots on the fitted surface are identified and then the proposed fake or “virtual hairs” (sites) having emergence angles that match the emergence angles of the existing hair are generated. These virtual hairs need to be generated so they lie on the scalp surface, so that the implantation tool may be then aligned to the sites just prior to the actual implantation. FIG. 6 is a depiction of this procedure and it is based on an assumption that the patient has some pre-existing hair in the area of the proposed implant site. Similarly to the processes described in reference to FIG. 3, images containing existing “real” follicular units are obtained, processed, segmented and hairs in the FOV (denoted as F_(i) in FIG. 6) are identified. At 200, the image processor analyzes images, for example, stereo images, and identifies a set of bald spots where candidate implant sites can be generated. (S_(i) in FIG. 6). The existing hairs are subsequently reconstructed into their 3D coordinates (at 210) and a surface fit is performed (at 220), for example, as explained in reference to FIG. 3. At 230 implant sites are created by generating virtual hairs. In some embodiments, in generating virtual hairs, one may choose upfront not to match automatically their orientation to the orientation of the pre-existing hair, but rather compare each relevant emergence angle to the recommended minimum approach angle of the tool, and generates virtual hairs such that they never appear below the minimum approach angle of the tool. The recommended minimum tool approach angle may be selected in the same ranges as previously provided, for example, between 45° and 65° depending upon a specific area of the scalp that is being implanted. As discussed in previous section, a maximum approach angles may be recommended as well. In other embodiments, virtual hairs are initially generated at least partially based on the emergence angles of the pre-existing hair. However, during the step of orienting the implantation tool, the emergence angle of the virtual hair is compared to the suggested minimum approach angle of the tool (or the suggested maximum approach angle of the tool), and the tool is oriented for implantation based on the results of such comparison, as described above. If a robotic system for hair transplantation is used, then the robotic arm with the implantation tool orients itself appropriately (depending on the comparison between an emergence angle of these virtual hairs and the minimum tool approach angle). Alternatively, in case of the procedure conducted using a hand-held device, the user holding the implantation tool orients the tool for implantation based on the results of the same comparison. The operator may also choose to move these automatically generated implant sites if so desired. In order to make this movement physically meaningful, as the operator uses the mouse (or some other pointing device) to move the individual hair(s) their tail positions are altered such that they lie on the fitted surface that represents the patient's scalp.

The aforementioned process is viable if there exists a multitude of pre-existing real hairs in the FOV. Strictly speaking, there must be at least three real hairs for a planar fit but practically speaking one requires at least 3×, or more for a robust regression analysis. If the patient is completely bald or highly sparse, the system may use external markers (fiducials) or anatomical landmarks (e.g. moles, scars, etc.) to perform the surface fit. FIG. 7 is an illustration of this methodology using fiducials placed, for example, on the patient's scalp (see 300). In some embodiments, fiducials may be placed, for example, on a skin tensioner used during the procedure instead of the actual body surface, such as scalp. At 310 images of the body surface with fiducials is acquired, at 320 previously described processing, including segmentation, determination of fiducials and bald spot locations is performed. At 330, 3D reconstruction is done and at 340 a surface fit is performed. After the surface fit is performed, virtual hairs (or sites) are generated as shown at 350 and as described above in reference to FIG. 6. As before, either the emergence angle of such virtual hair, or the orientation of the implantation tool is determined based on taking into the account, for example, the minimum approach angle of the implanting tool, such as needle. One of the input considerations is the area of the scalp that is being implanted. More acute/smaller angles/orientations are desirable in the hairline and the temple region. Less acute/higher angles are common in the top of the scalp. The steps of hair implantation (whether using automated or manual systems) may be the same or similar to those described in reference to FIG. 6. In one embodiment used as an example, the method for orienting a tool for implanting follicular units relative to a body surface may comprise using fiducial markers to generate one or more virtual FU having an emergence angle; selecting or using a pre-selected minimum approach angle of a implanting tool for implanting follicular units; identifying the emergence angle of the one or more virtual FU to be not less than the minimum approach angle of the implanting tool; and orienting the implanting tool with the identified emergence angle of the one or more virtual FU.

In certain embodiments, a combined procedure may be implemented using previously described methods in reference to hair harvesting and further comprising the surface fit process and/or emergence angle determination in orienting a tool for implanting FUs, in generation of the virtual hairs, and in the creation of the implant sites.

The image processor, such as any of those described in reference to FIG. 2, processes the obtained image to identify the desired information about the follicular unit of interest. The image processor may be configured for determining an emergence angle of the follicular unit, choosing a minimal approach angle of a tool for harvesting follicular units, and comparing the emergence angle of the follicular unit to the minimal approach angle of the tool. Based on the results of such comparison, it may be configured to instruct the robotic arm with the attached harvesting tool (or a hand-held tool in manual procedures) on how to orient relative to the follicular unit. The image processor may be also configured to practice methods of the invention during hair implantation, as described above. For example, it may be configured for determining an emergence angle of the pre-existing follicular unit, choosing a minimum (or in some embodiment, a maximum) approach angle of a tool for implanting follicular units, and comparing the emergence angle of the follicular unit to the minimal (or maximum) approach angle of the tool. Based on the results of such comparison, it may be configured to instruct the robotic arm with the attached implantation tool (or a hand-held tool in manual procedures) on how to orient accordingly.

The inventions disclosed herein are also directed to an image processor comprising one or more modules or components for executing operations on the image data. The above one or more modules may include instructions for one or more of the following: receiving an image containing a FU; determining an emergence angle of the FU; selecting a minimum (or a maximum in some embodiments) approach angle of a tool used in hair transplantation procedure; comparing the emergence angle of the FU with the minimum (or maximum) approach angle of the tool; and orienting the tool relative to the FU based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum (maximum) approach angle of the tool. The above-mentioned components or modules may comprise an emergence angle determination component, angle comparison component (compares an emergence angle of the FU of interest with a selected minimum/maximum approach angle of the tool), tool orientation component. Various described modules and components may be a part of single software or hardware product.

The image processor as described above could be used in conjunction with various manual, partially automated and fully automated (including robotic) hair transplantation and treatment systems and devices, including but not limited to systems for hair harvesting, or hair transplantation. Similarly, the image processor of the present invention could be used with hair treatment planning systems.

While the inventions described herein are especially useful in robotically operated systems for harvesting/transplanting hair, it will also provide great benefit to a physician who harvests follicular units using a manual FUE technique with manual/partially/fully automated hand-held tools, as it will guide the physician in adjusting an angle of insertion of the tool to avoid transecting or otherwise damaging the follicular unit or tissue to be harvested. Similarly, it will benefit a physician who performs implantation using a hand-held device.

One such implementation is shown as an example in FIG. 8. In this embodiment, a physician is conducting a manual operation on the patient using a hand-held tool 44, for example, a harvesting tool and/or an implanting tool, and he/she may wear the typical glasses 50 that have high-magnification. An image acquisition device 52, such as one or more cameras, may be attached to the hand-held instrument or tool 44. In some additional embodiments, it may be a stand-alone image acquisition device. The image processor, such as the computer 42, may execute various steps as described herein and perform the image analysis and processing, including 3D reconstruction, surface fit, determining an emergence angle of the existing follicular units, comparing the emergence angle with the minimum approach angle of the tool and determining the angle offset between the above two measurements, or determining the desired emergence angle for the virtual hairs in case of the hair implantation procedure. The monitor 40 may display the highlighted follicular unit(s), fiducials locations, or bald spots, as well as all other useful data, for example, emergence angle of the follicular unit(s) to be harvested, as well as the proposed orientation of the hand-held tool relative to such follicular unit(s) to be harvested or an adjustment angle/distance required to move the tool into the proper harvesting position relative to the FU.

Similarly, in case of the implanting procedure, the monitor 40 may display additional parameters, including those previously discussed, useful in conducting hair implantation for achieving correct tool orientation and implantation angles. Guided by the information displayed on the monitor, a physician may adjust the tool approach angle and orientation of the harvesting tool in his/her hands relative to the FU selected for harvesting, or orientation of the implanting tool in his/her hands for implanting. Orienting the hand-held tool may be actuated by a variety of different mechanisms, for example, mechanical or electronic mechanisms. In some embodiments, a body of the hand-held tool may be operatively connected to or supported by a guide structure having an angular indicator. Guided by the previously determined angle of insertion displayed on the monitor, the user may rotate the angular position of the tool until the reading on the angular indicator matches the angle on the monitor. The tool may be permanently or removably connected to the guide structure and angular indicator. Some embodiments may use a circular dial having angular indicia markings, in other embodiments it may be an electronic display with arrows and lights. FIG. 8 schematically represents as an example an indicator 54 mounted on the hand-held tool 44. In some alternative embodiments, the hand-held tool may comprise a transducer or other sensor (shown as 56 in FIG. 8) that electronically connects to the imaging system. Alternatively, the sensor 56 may be a part of the imaging system 52.

As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the methods of the present invention may be embodied, at least in pall, in software and carried out in a computer system or other data processing system. Therefore, in some exemplary embodiments hardware may be used in combination with software instructions to implement the present invention. For example, an article of manufacture of the present invention may comprise a machine-accessible medium including data that, when accessed by a machine, cause the machine to perform operations, such as determining an emergence angle of a FU of interest; choosing a minimal approach angle of a tool (e.g. a tool for harvesting follicular units, or a tool for implanting follicular units, or a combination of both); comparing the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and orienting the tool relative to the FU of interest based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool.

A machine-readable medium may be used to store software and data which causes the system to perform methods of the present invention. The above-mentioned machine-readable medium may include any suitable medium capable of storing and transmitting information in a form accessible by processing device, for example, a computer. Some examples of the machine-readable medium include, but not limited to, magnetic disc storage, flash memory device, optical storage, random access memory, etc.

The foregoing illustrated and described embodiments of the invention are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, and it should be understood that the invention generally, as well as the specific embodiments described herein, are not limited to the particular forms or embodiments disclosed, but to the contrary cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims. By way of non-limiting example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that particular features or characteristics described in reference to one figure or embodiment may be combined as suitable with features or characteristics described in another figure or embodiment. Similarly, the invention is not limited to the use of a robotic system including a robotic arm, and that other automated, semi-automated or manual systems may be utilized.

While the invention has been described in its preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the words which have been used are words of description and not of limitation. Therefore, changes may be made within the appended claims without departing from the true scope of the invention. 

1. A method for orienting a tool for transplanting follicular units, comprising: choosing a minimum approach angle of a tool based at least in part on an average or mean emergence angle of a plurality of follicular units in an area; determining an emergence angle of a follicular unit of interest; comparing the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and determining orientation of the tool based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising orienting the tool based on the result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein orienting the tool comprises orienting the tool relative to the follicular unit of interest.
 4. The method of claim 2, wherein orienting the tool comprises orienting the tool relative to a recipient area where a hair graft is to be implanted.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein if the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is greater than or equal to the minimum approach angle, the tool is oriented substantially to the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein if the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is greater than or equal to the minimum approach angle, the tool is oriented to an angle substantially equal to a sum of the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest and a selected number of degrees.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein if the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is greater than a maximum approach angle, the tool is oriented to the maximum approach angle.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein if the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is greater than the minimum approach angle by more than a predetermined value, the tool is oriented to an angle that is above the minimum approach angle and not more than a sum of the minimum approach angle and the predetermined value.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein if the emergence angle of the follicular unit is less than the minimum approach angle and a difference between the minimum approach angle and the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is less than a predetermined value, the tool is oriented at an angle which is substantially equal to the sum of the predetermined value and the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein lithe emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest is less than the minimum approach angle, the tool is oriented substantially to the minimum approach angle.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein choosing the minimum approach angle of the tool comprises adding a predetermined value to the average or mean emergence angle of the plurality of follicular units in the area.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the minimum approach angle of the tool is selected at least partially based on interpolation between at least two minimum tool approach angles, each of the at least two minimum tool approach angles being determined based on the corresponding mean or average emergence angles of follicular units.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the at least two minimum tool approach angles comprise an angle associated with an upper average or mean emergence angle and an angle associated with a lower average or mean emergence angle.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the interpolation is linear, quadratic or cubic.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the at least two minimum tool approach angles are user-specified or based on historic data.
 16. The method of claim 12, further comprising modifying at least one minimum approach angle associated with a mean or average emergence angle and interpolating between the modified at least one minimum approach angle and one of the at least two minimum approach angles that is farthest from the modified at least one minimum approach angle.
 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the minimum approach angle is additionally based on any one or more of existing data, experience, characteristics of the follicular units, characteristics of the area, or a force required to facilitate tool penetration.
 18. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the steps of determining the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest, comparing the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool, or determining orientation of the tool based on the result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the follicular unit of interest with the minimum approach angle of the tool, are carried out automatically.
 19. The method of claim 2, wherein orientation of the tool carried out automatically by a robotic arm.
 20. A system for hair transplantation, comprising: an interface adapted to receive an image data containing a data associated with a follicular unit (FU); and an image processor comprising one or more modules for executing operations on the image data, the one or more modules including instructions for: determining an emergence angle of the FU; selecting or using a pre-selected minimum approach angle of a tool used in transplantation of follicular units based at least in part on an average or mean emergence angle of a plurality of follicular units in an area; comparing the emergence angle of the FU with the minimum approach angle of the tool; and determining orientation of the tool based on a result of the comparison of the emergence angle of the FU with the minimum approach angle of the tool.
 21. The system of claim 20, further comprising an image acquisition device.
 22. The system of claim 20, wherein the system is a robotic system and it further comprises a robotic arm and the tool, and wherein the tool is operatively connected to the robotic arm. 